RBC Emerging Markets Equity Index ETF

You are on: FUND INDIVIDUAL page

Select Another Fund:
Go

 

Investment Objective

RBC Emerging Markets Equity Index ETF seeks to replicate, to the extent possible and before fees and expenses, the performance of a broad emerging markets equity index. Currently, the ETF seeks to track the FTSE Emerging Index.

Fund Information

Ticker Symbol: REEM
Exchange: Aequitas NEO Exchange
Assets ($mm): 28.76
Units Outstanding: 1,450,000
Mgmt. Fee: 0.25
2017 MER: 0.56
CUSIP: 74934M107
Income Distribution: Quarterly
Capital Gains Distribution: Annually
Index: FTSE Emerging Index
Inception Date: Sep, 2017
Registered Account Eligibility: RRSPs, RRIFs, RESPs, DPSPs and TFSAs


Prices

Fund Market Price
(as of June 19, 2018)
Closing Price 19.67
Change ($) -0.31
Change (%) -1.55
Market 52 Week High 21.93
Market 52 Week Low 19.85
Volume 185
Fund Net Asset Value
(as of June 19, 2018)
NAV Price 19.83
Change ($) -0.26
Change (%) -1.28
NAV per Share 52 Week High 21.89
NAV per Share 52 Week Low 19.67
   


Performance Analysis

(as of May 31, 2018) 1
  YTD 1Mo 3Mo 6Mo 1Yr 3Yr 5Yr Since Incep
NAV


Portfolio Analysis

 (as of June 19, 2018)
Number of Securities 852
Weighted Average Dividend Yield (%)
Weighted Average Price to Earnings 14.33
Weighted Average Price to Book 1.75
Weighted Average Market Cap ($MM) 123,733
Weighted Average Beta 1.09

Geographic Breakdown
(as of May 31, 2018)

Sector Breakdown
(as of May 31, 2018)


Industry Breakdown
(as of May 31, 2018)


Underlying Holdings  (as of June 19, 2018) % Assets
ISHARES MSCI INDIA ETF 11.5
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 6.3
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD 4.0
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD - ADR 3.7
NASPERS LTD 2.2
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP 1.9
US DOLLAR
INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LTD 1.4
BAIDU INC - ADR 1.2
PING AN INSURANCE GROUP CO OF CHINA LTD 1.1
 
Top Holdings (% of Portfolio) 33.4%
Total Number of Holdings 852


Distributions & Tax Information

Distributions for Year: 2018
Choose distribution year:
Go
Distr. Period Ex-Dividend Date Record Date Pay Date Cash Distr. Per Unit Re-invested Distr. Per Unit Total Distr. Per Unit††
Mar, 2018 03/22/2018 03/23/2018 03/29/2018 0.111 0.111
Jun, 2018 06/22/2018 06/25/2018 06/29/2018 0.120 0.120
Year to Date   0.231 0.231

Notes:

Securities regulations do not allow us to report performance for an exchange-traded fund that has been available for less than one year. This fund was launched September 21, 2017.

Securities regulations do not allow us to report performance, including yield, for an exchange-traded fund that has been available for less than one year.

† Distributions by the RBC ETF that are not paid in cash but result in additional units of the RBC ETF. These distributions should be accounted for by investors for tax purposes by adding the distribution amount to the adjusted cost base of the units held.

†† The exact tax treatment of the distributions for a calendar year is calculated after the RBC ETF's tax year-end. As a result, investors will receive an official tax statement from their broker detailing the type of income they have to report for tax purposes for the entire year and not for each distribution.

Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Please read the prospectus or Fund Facts document before investing. ETFs are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. ETF units are bought and sold at market price on a stock exchange and brokerage commissions will reduce returns. RBC ETFs do not seek to return any predetermined amount at maturity. Index returns do not represent RBC ETF returns. RBC ETFs are managed by RBC Global Asset Management Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Bank of Canada. The indicated rates of return are the historical total returns for the periods including changes in unit value and reinvestment of all distributions and do not take into account sales, redemption, commission charges or income taxes payable by any unitholder that would have reduced returns.